Day 69 of 150 Memory Difficulty 5/10

Source monitoring decides whether a memory feels real

Quick answer

Source monitoring decides whether a memory feels real. Today's question (Source monitoring framework) asks about a finding from Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. in 1993. The correct option is Characteristics of the trace such as perceptual detail, contextual information, and cognitive operations — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

In Johnson, Hashtroudi, and Lindsay's source-monitoring framework, what determines whether a remembered event is judged as 'really happened' versus 'imagined'?

  1. A The total amount of detail recalled, regardless of type
  2. B Characteristics of the trace such as perceptual detail, contextual information, and cognitive operations
  3. C Whether the event was emotionally arousing
  4. D Only conscious metacognitive judgements made at encoding
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Characteristics of the trace such as perceptual detail, contextual information, and cognitive operations

Johnson, Hashtroudi, and Lindsay (1993) proposed that source monitoring — distinguishing where a memory came from (perceived, imagined, told to us) — relies on attribute heuristics applied to the trace at retrieval. Real perceptual events typically carry more sensory detail (vivid sights, sounds), more contextual information (time, place), and fewer self-generated cognitive operations than imagined events. When these attributes overlap (e.g., a vividly imagined or repeatedly rehearsed event), source confusions occur — explaining false memories, imagination inflation, and parts of eyewitness misidentification. The framework gave a mechanistic alternative to assuming memory is simply true or false.

About the source

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.