Day 70 of 150 Memory Difficulty 3/10

Flashbulb memories feel certain but drift like any other

Quick answer

Flashbulb memories feel certain but drift like any other. Today's question (Flashbulb memory) asks about a finding from Hirst, W., Phelps, E. A., Meksin, R., Vaidya, C. J., Johnson, M. K., et al. in 2015. The correct option is People feel high confidence in flashbulb details that are nonetheless inaccurate or change over time — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Long-term studies of 'flashbulb memories' for events like 9/11 found what?

  1. A Flashbulb memories remain perfectly accurate over years, unlike everyday memories
  2. B People feel high confidence in flashbulb details that are nonetheless inaccurate or change over time
  3. C Flashbulb memories never form for emotionally significant events
  4. D Only people directly involved in an event form flashbulb memories
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — People feel high confidence in flashbulb details that are nonetheless inaccurate or change over time

Brown & Kulik (1977) coined 'flashbulb memory' for the vivid, detailed, long-lasting recall people report for shocking events. Subsequent prospective studies — including Hirst et al.'s ten-year longitudinal study of 9/11 memories — show that confidence stays sky-high while accuracy drops at roughly the same rate as ordinary autobiographical memory, with substantial month-to-month inconsistency. The phenomenology of certainty is dissociated from accuracy. Emotion appears to enhance the subjective vividness of the trace and the central gist, but does not protect it from the same reconstructive distortions that affect mundane memories.

About the source

Hirst, W., Phelps, E. A., Meksin, R., Vaidya, C. J., Johnson, M. K., et al. (2015). A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 604–623.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.