Day 96 of 150 Memory Difficulty 3/10
Taking a test beats re-reading for long-term retention
Quick answer
Taking a test beats re-reading for long-term retention. Today's question (Testing effect) asks about a finding from Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. in 2006. The correct option is Substantially better long-term retention than the restudy-only group — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.
Today's question
Roediger and Karpicke (2006) had students study a passage and then either restudy it or take a recall test. One week later, the test-then-restudy group showed:
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct: C — Substantially better long-term retention than the restudy-only group
In their classic study, Roediger and Karpicke (2006) found that students who took an initial recall test recalled about 60% of the passage one week later, while those who only re-read the passage recalled about 40% — despite re-readers feeling more confident. This testing effect is one of the largest and most replicated findings in learning science: retrieval practice produces deeper, more durable memory than restudy, even though learners typically rate retrieval as harder and less effective. The result is the empirical anchor for retrieval-practice and self-quizzing study habits.
About the source
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.
More from the Cognition Bible
Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.